Comparison of the Effects of Using MiECC System and Centrifugal Pumps with Conventional CPB on Patient Recovery Processes in CABG Surgery
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
VOLUME: 3 ISSUE: 2
P: 49 - 59
August 2025

Comparison of the Effects of Using MiECC System and Centrifugal Pumps with Conventional CPB on Patient Recovery Processes in CABG Surgery

Turk J Clin Cardiov Perfusion 2025;3(2):49-59
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 11.02.2026
Accepted Date: 17.03.2026
Online Date: 15.04.2026
Publish Date: 15.04.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most widely used and effective treatment modalities for coronary artery disease and is most commonly performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) is a perfusion strategy designed to reduce CPB–related adverse effects through a closed–circuit configuration and reduced priming volume. This study aimed to compare the effects of conventional centrifugal–pump CPB and MiECC systems on perioperative patient recovery in isolated CABG surgery.

Materials and Methods

This prospective descriptive study was conducted between May and September 2025 at University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital in İstanbul. Sixty patients undergoing elective isolated CABG were allocated to two groups: the MiECC group (n = 30) and the conventional CPB group using a centrifugal pump (n = 30). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were compared, including fluid balance, lactate difference, blood transfusion, activated clotting time (ACT), drainage volume, transfusion requirements, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, and laboratory values measured at 0, 6, 24, and 48 hours and on postoperative day 5.

Results

Preoperative demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and intraoperative variables, including the number of anastomoses, CPB duration, and aortic cross–clamp time, were similar between the groups. The MiECC group demonstrated significantly lower intraoperative fluid balance and ACT values. Postoperative drainage volume during the first 24 hours, allogeneic blood product utilization, and ICU length of stay were also significantly reduced. In addition, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels were better preserved in the early postoperative period, while lactate dehydrogenase levels during the first 48 hours and total bilirubin levels at postoperative hour 6 were significantly lower in the MiECC group.

Conclusion

In conclusion, MiECC was associated with reduced hemodilution, improved preservation of blood cellular components, decreased postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements, and a shorter ICU length of stay in patients undergoing isolated CABG. The use of MiECC may be recommended with appropriate patient selection and standardized perfusion protocols.

Keywords:
MiECC, centrifugal pump, cardiopulmonary bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting

References

1
Wahba A, Milojevic M, Boer C, De Somer FMJJ, Gudbjartsson T, van den Goor J, et al. 2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(2):210-251.
2
Wahba A, Kunst G, De Somer F, Agerup Kildahl H, Milne B, Kjellberg G, et al. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025;40(2):ivaf002.
3
Topak R. Kardiyopulmoner bypass prime volümündeki değişimin, intraoperatif/postoperatif kan kullanımı ve sistemik inflamasyon üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi [tıpta uzmanlık tezi]. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü; 2022. Available from: https://avesis.deu.edu.tr/yonetilen-tez/318c6471-5909-4d90-b3fd-2b537897acad/kardiyopulmoner-bypass-prime-volumundeki-degisimin-intraoperatif-postoperatif-kan-kullanimi-ve-sistemik-inflamasyon-uzerine-etkisinin-degerlendirilmesi.
4
Anastasiadis K, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A, Antonitsis P. Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC): the state-of-the-art in perfusion. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 10):1507-1514.
5
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A. Miniaturizing cardiopulmonary bypass. In Kırali K, Coselli JS, Kalangos A (editors). Cardiopulmonary bypass. Academic Press, 2023:529-537.
6
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Voucharas C, Apostolidou-Kiouti F, Deliopoulos A, Haidich AB, et al. Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery: A contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025;67(4):ezaf112.
7
Cheng T, Barve R, Cheng YWM, Ravendren A, Ahmed A, Toh S, et al. Conventional versus miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JTCVS Open. 2021;8:418-441.
8
Shetty T, Darbari A, Sainath P. A narrative review on miniaturized extracorporeal technology and circuits: A revolutionary approach to cardiac surgery. Cardiothorac Surg. 2025;33:11.
9
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A, Grosomanidis V, Tossios P. Modular minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems; can they become the standard practice for performing cardiac surgery? Perfusion. 2015;30(3):195-200.
10
Anastasiadis K, Murkin J, Antonitsis P, Bauer A, Ranucci M, Gygax E, et al. Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(5):647-662.
11
Kunst G, Milojevic M, Boer C, De Somer FMJJ, Gudbjartsson T, van den Goor J, et al. 2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(6):713-757.
12
Aktaş Yıldırım S, Tosun Canlı M, Güçyetmez B, Toraman F. Is the intraoperative lactate-standard base excess relationship strong in cardiac surgery? GKDA Derg. 2024;30(1):9-15.
13
Ranucci M, Carboni G, Cotza M, Bianchi P, Di Dedda U, Aloisio T, et al. Hemodilution on cardiopulmonary bypass as a determinant of early postoperative hyperlactatemia. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126939.
14
Rivera Jiménez KE, Mamani Ticona YM, Gutierrez-Chavez G, Astudillo CO, Calle E, Heredia GAT, et al. Heparin resistance in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: Mechanisms, clinical implications, and evidence-based management. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(12):2088.
15
Tibi P, McClure RS, Huang J, Baker RA, Fitzgerald D, Mazer CD, et al. STS/SCA/AmSECT/SABM update to the clinical practice guidelines on patient blood management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112(3):981-1004.
16
Elçi ME, Kahraman A, Mutlu E, İspir CS. Effects of minimal extracorporeal circulation on the systemic inflammatory response and the need for transfusion after coronary bypass grafting surgery. Cardiol Res Pract. 2019:1726150.
17
İnal K, Yerli İ, Kocailik A, Karasu H, Gürcü ME, Kırali MK. Comparison of the effects of MIECC and conventional CPB methods with autologous blood on intraoperative hemodilution and blood utilization in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Turk J Clin Cardiov Perfusion. 2024;2(2):38-46.
18
Palomba H, Treml RE, Caldonazo T, Katayama HT, Gomes BC, Malbouisson LMS, et al. Intraoperative fluid balance and cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: A multicenter prospective study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022;72(6):688-694.
19
Ellam S, Räsänen J, Hartikainen J, Selander T, Juutilainen A, Halonen J. Impact of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on perioperative intravenous fluid management in coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion. 2023;38(1):135-141.
20
Ozgur MM, Aksut M, Ozer T, Gurel B, Yerli İ, Şimşek M, et al. Comparison of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass systems on coronary artery bypass surgery. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2024;32(2):141-150.
21
Pereira SN, Zumba IB, Batista MS, Pieve Dd, Santos Ed, Stuermer R, et al. Comparison of two techniques of cardiopulmonary bypass (conventional and mini CPB) in the trans- and postoperative periods of cardiac surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2015;30(4):433-442.
22
Puis L, Milojevic M, Boer C, De Somer FMJJ, Gudbjartsson T, van den Goor J, et al. 2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020;30(2):161-202.
23
Casselman FPA, Lance MD, Ahmed A, Ascari A, Blanco-Morillo J, Bolliger D, et al. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025;40(5):ivae170.
24
Erdoes G, Koster A, Haas T. The Current Value of Patient Blood Management in Cardiac Surgery: WHO Can Help to Improve? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2026;40(1):28-30.
25
Halle DR, Benhassen LL, Søberg KL, Nielsen PF, Kimose HH, Bauer A, et al. Impact of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on systemic inflammatory response: A randomized trial. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19(1):418.
26
Kırali K, Aksüt M, Altaş Ö, Gürcü ME, Aydın S. Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes between hybrid system and MiECC: A prospective pilot study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025;57:74-81.
27
Motawea KR, Ibrahim M, Amer AE, Kandil O, Abourady Y, Pelletier M, et al. Comparison of post-operative inflammatory biomarkers between minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation and conventional extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of 15 randomized control trials. Perfusion. 2025.
28
Brown JK, Shaw AD, Mythen MG, Guzzi L, Reddy VS, Crisafi C, et al. Adult cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: Joint consensus report. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023;37(9):1579-1590.
29
Graßler A, Bauernschmitt R, Guthoff I, Kunert A, Hoenicka M, Albrecht G, et al. Effects of pulsatile minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on fibrinolysis and organ protection in adult cardiac surgery: A prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 10):1453-1463.
30
Scurt FG, Bose K, Mertens PR, Chatzikyrkou C, Herzog C. Cardiac surgery- associated acute kidney injury. Kidney360. 2024;5(6):909-926.
31
Bhirowo YP, Raksawardana YK, Setianto BY, Sudadi S, Tandean TN, Zaharo AF, et al. Hemolysis and cardiopulmonary bypass: Meta-analysis and systematic review of contributing factors. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;18(1):291.
32
Passaroni AC, Felicio ML, Campos NLKL, Silva MAM, Yoshida WB. Hemolysis and inflammatory response to extracorporeal circulation during on-pump CABG: comparison between roller and centrifugal pump systems. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;33(1):64-71.
33
Modrau IS, Halle DR, Nielsen PH, Kimose HH, Greisen JR, Kremke M, et al. (2020). Impact of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on coagulation: A randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(6):1145-1153.
34
Doğan S. Koroner by-pass cerrahisinde minimal invaziv ekstrakorporeal dolaşım ile konvansiyonel kalp akciğer makinesinin klinik, laboratuvar ve hemostaz parametreleri açısından karşılaştırılması [doktora tezi]. Bursa: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi; 2025. Available from: https://acikerisim.uludag.edu.tr/items/16526acf-d7c7-4931-b324-eb334a4dacd4
35
Pabón-Carrasco M, Cáceres-Matos R, Martínez-Flores S, Luque-Oliveros M. The effectiveness of cell salvage in extracorporeal circulation surgeries in relation to use of health resources after use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30459.
36
Ali JM, Kovzel M, McPhilimey E, Colah S, De Silva R, Moorjani N. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation is a cost-effective alternative to conventional extracorporeal circulation for coronary artery bypass grafting: propensity matched analysis. Perfusion. 2021;36(2):154-160.
37
Puehler T, Haneya A, Philipp A, Wiebe K, Keyser A, Rupprecht L, et al. Minimal extracorporeal circulation: An alternative for on-pump and off-pump coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(3):766-772.
38
Gunaydin S, Simsek E, Engelman D. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery and developments in perioperative care: A comprehensive review. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2025;33(1):121-131.
39
Jiang T, Xu L, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Wang S, Wang Y, et al. Implementing ultra- fast-track cardiac anesthesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025;39(8).2031-2039.